From: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Updated RUM-index and support for bigint as part of index |
Date: | 2016-08-07 08:05:52 |
Message-ID: | VisenaEmail.72.6511f5c5af6d2a29.156640575f8@tc7-visena |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
På søndag 07. august 2016 kl. 08:27:06, skrev Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com
<mailto:obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>>:
[snip]
have you considered <=| and |=> operators ? <=> in ORDER BY works like KNN.
I don't get how these operators should work. Neither give me the expected
results.
Using <=>
SELECT del.entity_id, del.folder_id, del.received_timestamp FROM
origo_email_delivery delWHERE del.fts_all @@ to_tsquery('simple',
'andreas:*&jose:*') ORDER BY '2000-01-01' :: TIMESTAMP <=>
del.received_timestampLIMIT 10;
entity_id | folder_id | received_timestamp
-----------+-----------+-------------------------
1224278 | 1068087 | 2015-08-17 23:53:26
1224382 | 1068087 | 2015-08-18 03:07:55
1224404 | 1068087 | 2015-08-18 03:49:02
1505713 | 48496 | 2015-10-27 14:51:45
142132 | 66658 | 2012-12-03 14:14:05.488
122565 | 90115 | 2012-11-20 15:41:04.936
200744 | 66655 | 2013-01-28 21:47:44.561
1445927 | 888665 | 2015-09-29 00:26:56
123671 | 83509 | 2012-11-21 14:16:26.448
1129928 | 66658 | 2015-05-09 08:39:14.128
(10 rows)
Using <=|
SELECT del.entity_id, del.folder_id, del.received_timestamp FROM
origo_email_delivery delWHERE del.fts_all @@ to_tsquery('simple',
'andreas:*&jose:*') ORDER BY '2000-01-01' :: TIMESTAMP <=|
del.received_timestampLIMIT 10;
entity_id | folder_id | received_timestamp
-----------+-----------+-------------------------
1224278 | 1068087 | 2015-08-17 23:53:26
1224382 | 1068087 | 2015-08-18 03:07:55
1224404 | 1068087 | 2015-08-18 03:49:02
1505713 | 48496 | 2015-10-27 14:51:45
142132 | 66658 | 2012-12-03 14:14:05.488
122565 | 90115 | 2012-11-20 15:41:04.936
200744 | 66655 | 2013-01-28 21:47:44.561
1445927 | 888665 | 2015-09-29 00:26:56
123671 | 83509 | 2012-11-21 14:16:26.448
1129928 | 66658 | 2015-05-09 08:39:14.128
(10 rows)
Neither are ordered by received_timestamp
Can you explain how to get ORDER BY received_timestamp DESC?
Thanks.
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andreas(at)visena(dot)com <mailto:andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Eduardo Morras | 2016-08-07 08:06:12 | Re: Streaming Replica Master-Salve Config. |
Previous Message | Philippe Girolami | 2016-08-07 07:32:07 | Re: Should a DB vacuum use up a lot of space ? |