From: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Strategy for moving a large DB to another machine with least possible down-time |
Date: | 2014-09-21 13:50:59 |
Message-ID: | VisenaEmail.6f.9316bc28db203d21.1489879daba@tc7-visena |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
På søndag 21. september 2014 kl. 15:48:00, skrev Adrian Klaver <
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>>: On 09/21/2014
05:44 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> På søndag 21. september 2014 kl. 13:51:00, skrev Bill Moran
> <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com <mailto:wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>>:
>
>
> I see this limitation in Slyny:
> http://slony.info/documentation/2.2/limitations.html
>
> Slony-I does not automatically replicate
>
> *
>
> Changes to large objects (BLOBS)
>
> *
>
> Changes made by DDL commands
>
> *
>
> Changes to users and roles
>
> Not being able to replicate BLOBS is a show-stopper for me as we have
> lots of them.
Well I would say it depends on where you are storing the binary data, in
large objects or in a bytea column? If you are using bytea columns then
you would be okay. If it is large objects then you have a problem.
Large-objects, not BYTEA, as they allow for much more efficient streaming
(require less memory). -- Andreas Joseph Krogh CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963 andreas(at)visena(dot)com <mailto:andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com> <https://www.visena.com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2014-09-21 14:10:54 | Re: Strategy for moving a large DB to another machine with least possible down-time |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2014-09-21 13:48:00 | Re: Strategy for moving a large DB to another machine with least possible down-time |