Re: PG-10 + ICU and abbreviated keys

From: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG-10 + ICU and abbreviated keys
Date: 2017-11-13 20:48:54
Message-ID: VisenaEmail.57.761d918d5ec1bd06.15fb7243e9d@tc7-visena
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

På mandag 13. november 2017 kl. 21:46:08, skrev Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie
<mailto:pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>>:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>> Do I have to explicitly specify collation when using ORDER by on that
column for index and abbreviated keys to be used?
>
> Only if you didn't define the column with a per-column collation initially.

BTW, if you specifically want to quickly verify whether or not
abbreviated keys were used, you can do that by setting "trace_sort =
on", and possibly setting "client_min_messages = LOG", too.

There should be quite a bit of debug output from that that
specifically mentions abbreviated keys.
 
Thanks.
 
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andreas(at)visena(dot)com <mailto:andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>

 

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-11-13 21:28:40 Re: PG-10 + ICU and abbreviated keys
Previous Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2017-11-13 20:48:01 Re: PG-10 + ICU and abbreviated keys