From: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: index on ILIKE/LIKE - PostgreSQL 9.2 |
Date: | 2016-05-12 07:57:58 |
Message-ID: | VisenaEmail.2c.aade81ef7cd95e97.154a3f4065d@tc7-visena |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
På torsdag 12. mai 2016 kl. 02:30:33, skrev Lucas Possamai <drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com
<mailto:drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com>>:
Hi there!
I've got a simple but slow query:
SELECT DISTINCT title
FROM ja_jobs WHERE title ILIKE '%RYAN WER%'
and clientid = 31239 AND time_job > 1457826264
order BY title
limit 10
Explain analyze:
Limit (cost=5946.40..5946.41 rows=1 width=19) (actual time=2746.759..2746.772
rows=1 loops=1)
-> Unique (cost=5946.40..5946.41 rows=1 width=19) (actual
time=2746.753..2746.763 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=5946.40..5946.41 rows=1 width=19) (actual
time=2746.750..2746.754 rows=4 loops=1)
Sort Key: "title"
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on "ja_jobs" (cost=49.02..5946.39 rows=1
width=19) (actual time=576.275..2746.609 rows=4 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: (("clientid" = 31239) AND ("time_job" >
1457826264))
Filter: (("title")::"text" ~~* '%RYAN WER%'::"text")
Rows Removed by Filter: 791
-> Bitmap Index Scan on "ix_jobs_client_times"
(cost=0.00..49.02 rows=1546 width=0) (actual time=100.870..100.870 rows=795
loops=1)
Index Cond: (("clientid" = 31239) AND ("time_job" >
1457826264))
Total runtime: 2746.879 ms
Then, I created a trgm index:
CREATE INDEX ix_ja_jobs_trgm_gin ON public.ja_jobs USING gin (title
gin_trgm_ops);
Explain analyze after the index: (Yes, I ran the analyze)
Limit (cost=389.91..389.91 rows=1 width=20) (actual time=3720.511..3720.511
rows=0 loops=1)
-> Unique (cost=389.91..389.91 rows=1 width=20) (actual
time=3720.507..3720.507 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=389.91..389.91 rows=1 width=20) (actual
time=3720.505..3720.505 rows=0 loops=1)
Sort Key: "title"
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on "ja_jobs" (cost=385.88..389.90 rows=1
width=20) (actual time=3720.497..3720.497 rows=0 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: (("clientid" = 31239) AND ("time_job" >
1457826264) AND (("title")::"text" ~~ '%RYAN WER%'::"text"))
Rows Removed by Index Recheck: 4
-> BitmapAnd (cost=385.88..385.88 rows=1 width=0)
(actual time=3720.469..3720.469 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on "ix_jobs_client_times"
(cost=0.00..50.00 rows=1644 width=0) (actual time=0.142..0.142 rows=795
loops=1)
Index Cond: (("clientid" = 31239) AND
("time_job" > 1457826264))
-> Bitmap Index Scan on "ix_ja_jobs_trgm_gin"
(cost=0.00..335.63 rows=484 width=0) (actual time=3720.213..3720.213 rows=32
loops=1)
Index Cond: (("title")::"text" ~~ '%RYAN WER
%'::"text")
Total runtime: 3720.653 ms
so.. the query is still slow..
Do you guys know what can be done ? related to the ILIKE?
cheers
Lucas
It uses available indexes, but that isn't good enough.
Try including clientid in the index, using the btree_gin extension:
CREATE INDEX ix_ja_jobs_trgm_clientid_gin ON public.ja_jobs USING gin (title
gin_trgm_ops, clientid);
Note that if clientid is a bigint you have to cast the value to bigint for
btree_gin to use it (note that this isn't necessary if you use a prepared
statement):
SELECT DISTINCT title
FROM ja_jobs WHERE title ILIKE '%RYAN WER%'
and clientid = 31239::bigint AND time_job > 1457826264
order BY title
limit 10
Also note that the index cannot ant won't be used for sorting. A bitmap-AND is
also inevitable because GIN-indexes cannot be used for the '>' operator, so PG
uses the ix_jobs_client_times btree-index and bigmap-ANDs the result.
Can you post you complete schema?
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andreas(at)visena(dot)com <mailto:andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2016-05-12 08:05:01 | Re: index on ILIKE/LIKE - PostgreSQL 9.2 |
Previous Message | Lucas Possamai | 2016-05-12 06:59:18 | Re: index on ILIKE/LIKE - PostgreSQL 9.2 |