From: | Laura Smith <n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp(at)protonmail(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | Paul Förster <paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | postgre <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres 12 RLS |
Date: | 2020-06-08 12:21:32 |
Message-ID: | UG1dqoKMj2nRTEjLDuxSFS6Utugw0A7jcNQrXjURQXX4v6qj4Ugbn7o-GhJTmP4RTH00wCRnXBnLTqfj50ZiFn2SV7v2fabAenPbAr0DYeI=@protonmail.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Monday, 8 June 2020 12:42, Paul Förster <paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Laura,
>
> > On 08. Jun, 2020, at 12:46, Laura Smith n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp(at)protonmail(dot)ch I had a lightbulb moment just now and tried that, but it doesn't seem to be working.
> > The app returns "pg_execute(): Query failed: ERROR: permission denied for table...."
> > This is despite me:
> > • Changing to SECURITY INVOKER on the PG function.
> > • Granting the app user relevant perms on the underlying table
> > • Re-granting execute for the app on the function
> > Am I missing somehthing ?
>
> another possibility maybe is to use session_user instead of current_user in your policy.
>
> current_user name user name of current execution context
> session_user name session user name
>
> The latter is the name of the user who actually started the session. So it should be myappuser in your case.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-info.html
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
Thanks Paul, will experiment with session_user.
But actually I found the solution, the function I was testing was using "INSERT ON CONFLICT UPDATE". And it seems that requires SELECT permissions due to "ON CONFLICT" (appuser was previously only granted INSERT and UPDATE).
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laura Smith | 2020-06-08 12:42:29 | "INSERT ON CONFLICT UPDATE" - Use of indexes ? |
Previous Message | Paul Förster | 2020-06-08 11:42:50 | Re: Postgres 12 RLS |