From: | "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Masahiko Sawada' <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alexey Lesovsky <lesovsky(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
Date: | 2022-01-17 08:03:17 |
Message-ID: | TYCPR01MB837339E6E2A3150781B6F632ED579@TYCPR01MB8373.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday, January 17, 2022 3:18 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've attached an updated patch. Please review it.
Hi, thank you for sharing a new patch.
Few comments on the v6.
(1) doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_subscription.sgml
+ resort. This option has no effect on the transaction that is already
One TAB exists between "resort" and "This".
(2) Minor improvement suggestion of comment in src/backend/replication/logical/worker.c
+ * reset during that. Also, we don't skip receiving the changes in streaming
+ * cases, since we decide whether or not to skip applying the changes when
I sugguest that you don't use 'streaming cases', because
what "streaming cases" means sounds a bit broader than actual your implementation.
We do skip transaction of streaming cases but not during the spooling phase, right ?
I suggest below.
"We don't skip receiving the changes at the phase to spool streaming transactions"
(3) in the comment of apply_handle_prepare_internal, two full-width characters.
3-1
+ * won’t be resent in a case where the server crashes between them.
3-2
+ * COMMIT PREPARED or ROLLBACK PREPARED. But that’s okay because this
You have full-width characters for "won't" and "that's".
Could you please check ?
(4) typo
+ * the subscription if hte user has specified skip_xid. Once we start skipping
"hte" should "the" ?
(5)
I can miss something here but, in one of
the past discussions, there seems a consensus that
if the user specifies XID of a subtransaction,
it would be better to skip only the subtransaction.
This time, is it out of the range of the patch ?
If so, I suggest you include some description about it
either in the commit message or around codes related to it.
(6)
I feel it's a better idea to include a test whether
to skip aborted streaming transaction clears the XID
in the TAP test for this feature, in a sense to cover
various new code paths. Did you have any special reason
to omit the case ?
(7)
I want more explanation for the reason to restart the subscriber
in the TAP test because this is not mandatory operation.
(We can pass the TAP tests without this restart)
From :
# Restart the subscriber node to restart logical replication with no interval
IIUC, below would be better.
To :
# As an optimization to finish tests earlier, restart the subscriber with no interval,
# rather than waiting for new error to laucher a new apply worker.
Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ronan Dunklau | 2022-01-17 08:18:04 | Re: Proposal: More structured logging |
Previous Message | Yura Sokolov | 2022-01-17 07:49:05 | Re: Fix BUG #17335: Duplicate result rows in Gather node |