From: | ro b <bigbro_wq(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Self contradictory examining on rel's baserestrictinfo |
Date: | 2024-11-27 15:28:17 |
Message-ID: | TYCPR01MB6093FDF02BC746CCC701172285282@TYCPR01MB6093.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I mean why can't draw the conclusions
like the case a>1 and a>2 which can be simplified
to a>2 if the operator > is btree opclass.
Best regards
________________________________
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2024 22:52
To: ro b <bigbro_wq(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>; pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Self contradictory examining on rel's baserestrictinfo
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 9:30 AM ro b <bigbro_wq(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The path i committed not just test contradictory but also do the
> simplification. The simplification is limited in the BTREE.
> Could you interpret the case in a little more detail.
I am not able to understand this paragraph.
Regretfully,
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-11-27 15:33:25 | Re: Don't overwrite scan key in systable_beginscan() |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-11-27 15:20:27 | Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart |