| From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
| Date: | 2023-01-24 14:34:05 |
| Message-ID: | TYCPR01MB5870C77C3B0CBF54F487170BF5C99@TYCPR01MB5870.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Hou,
> Sorry, the patch set was somehow attached twice. Here is the correct new version
> patch set which addressed all comments so far.
Thank you for updating the patch! I confirmed that
All of my comments are addressed.
One comment:
In this test the rollback-prepared seems not to be executed.
This is because serializations are finished while handling PREPARE message
and the final state of transaction does not affect that, right?
I think it may be helpful to add a one line comment.
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ronan Dunklau | 2023-01-24 14:38:13 | Re: Exclusion constraints on partitioned tables |
| Previous Message | Drouvot, Bertrand | 2023-01-24 14:31:24 | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |