| From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Alvaro Herrera' <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | 'vignesh C' <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | RE: pg_upgrade's interaction with pg_resetwal seems confusing |
| Date: | 2023-10-23 05:34:55 |
| Message-ID: | TYAPR01MB5866DAFE000F8677C49ACD66F5D8A@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Alvaro,
Thank you for updating! PSA new version.
> Note that this patch falsifies the comment in SetNextObjectId that
> taking the lock is pro forma only -- it no longer is, since in upgrade
> mode there can be multiple subprocesses running -- so I think it should
> be updated.
Indeed, some comments were updated.
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-pg_upgrade-use-upgrade-function-to-restore-OID.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2023-10-23 05:36:04 | RE: pg_upgrade's interaction with pg_resetwal seems confusing |
| Previous Message | Suraj Kharage | 2023-10-23 04:06:36 | Re: Server crash on RHEL 9/s390x platform against PG16 |