From: | "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Amit Kapila' <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
Date: | 2022-09-13 12:05:32 |
Message-ID: | TYAPR01MB5866CC00D3CA563C781C8F1BF5479@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
> > 01. filename
> > The word-ordering of filename seems not good
> > because you defined the new worker as "parallel apply worker".
> >
>
> I think in the future we may have more files for apply work (like
> applyddl.c for DDL apply work), so it seems okay to name all apply
> related files in a similar way.
> > That flag is set only when an apply worker spill the transaction to the disk.
> > How about "in_streamed_transaction" -> "in_spilled_transaction"?
> >
>
> Isn't this an existing variable? If so, it doesn't seem like a good
> idea to change the name unless we are changing its meaning.
Both of you said are reasonable. They do not have to be modified.
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-09-13 12:11:38 | Re: pgsql: Doc: Explain about Column List feature. |
Previous Message | kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com | 2022-09-13 12:02:26 | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |