RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Peter Smith' <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Date: 2023-04-11 10:30:35
Message-ID: TYAPR01MB586641134EF13CBF74F5746FF59A9@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Peter,

Thank you for giving explanation.

>
> Hopefully, someone will correct me if this explanation is wrong, but
> my understanding of the different prefixes is like this --
>
> "XXX" is used as a marker for future developers to consider maybe
> revisiting/improving something that the comment refers to
> e.g.
> /* XXX - it would be better to code this using blah but for now we did
> not.... */
> /* XXX - option 'foo' is not currently supported but... */
> /* XXX - it might be worth considering adding more checks or an assert
> here because... */
>
> OTOH, "Note" is just for highlighting why something is the way it is,
> but with no implication that it should be revisited/changed in the
> future.
> e.g.
> /* Note: We deliberately do not test the state here because... */
> /* Note: This memory must be zeroed because... */
> /* Note: This string has no '\0' terminator so... */

I confirmed that current "XXX" comments must be removed by improving
or some decision. Therefore I kept current annotation.

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2023-04-11 10:40:54 RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-04-11 10:29:45 Missing wait_for_replay_catchup in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl