From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | [PGdocs] fix description for handling pf non-ASCII characters |
Date: | 2023-06-23 14:25:13 |
Message-ID: | TYAPR01MB586631D0961BF9C44893FAB1F523A@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear hackers,
While discussing based on the article[1] with Japanese developers,
I found inconsistencies between codes and documents.
45b1a67a[2] changed the behavior when non-ASCII characters was set as application_name,
cluster_name and postgres_fdw.application_name, but it seemed not to be documented.
Previously non-ASCII chars were replaed with question makrs '?', but now they are replaced
with a hex escape instead.
How do you think? Is my understanding correct?
Acknowledgement:
Sawada-san and Shinoda-san led the developer's discussion.
Fujii-san was confirmed my points. Thank you for all of their works!
[1]: https://h50146.www5.hpe.com/products/software/oe/linux/mainstream/support/lcc/pdf/PostgreSQL16Beta1_New_Features_en_20230528_1.pdf
[2]: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=45b1a67a0fcb3f1588df596431871de4c93cb76f;hp=da5d4ea5aaac4fc02f2e2aec272efe438dd4e171
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
doc_fix.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | James Coleman | 2023-06-23 14:27:57 | Stampede of the JIT compilers |
Previous Message | Melih Mutlu | 2023-06-23 13:50:24 | Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication |