From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Amit Kapila' <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |
Date: | 2023-09-06 13:36:28 |
Message-ID: | TYAPR01MB5866039B67CFDA4CE38A3387F5EFA@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Amit,
Thank you for reviewing!
>
> I also think referring to the conflicting field would be better not
> only for the purpose of avoiding extra code but also to give accurate
> information about invalidated slots for which we want to give an
> error.
Fixed.
> Additionally, I think we should try to avoid writing a new function
> strtoLSN as that adds a maintainability burden. We can probably send
> the value fetched from pg_controldata in the query for comparison with
> confirmed_flush LSN.
Changed like that. LogicalSlotInfo was also updated to have the Boolean.
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2023-09-06 13:36:37 | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |
Previous Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2023-09-06 13:36:17 | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |