RE: libpq debug log

From: "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: "alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: libpq debug log
Date: 2021-03-11 01:51:55
Message-ID: TYAPR01MB2990E0EA5FFBA731568A0CE8FE909@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro-san, Tom-san, Horiguchi-san,

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
> +1 for the thanks for the quick work. I have some random comments
> after a quick look on it.

Thank you very much for giving many comments. And We're sorry to have caused you trouble. I told Iwata-san yesterday to modify the patch to use the logging function interface that Tom-san, Alvaro-san and I agreed on, that I'd review after the new revision has been posted, and let others know she is modifying the patch again so that they won't start reviewing. But I should have done the request on hackers.

We're catching up with your feedback and post the updated patch. Then I'll review it.

We appreciate your help so much.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-03-11 02:00:38 Re: Removing vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor
Previous Message Peter Smith 2021-03-11 01:50:27 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions