From: | "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Tomas Vondra' <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, "Andrey V(dot) Lepikhov" <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: POC: postgres_fdw insert batching |
Date: | 2021-01-21 01:52:48 |
Message-ID: | TYAPR01MB2990DB767E314A72A063EA32FEA10@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
> Right. But I think Tom is right this should initialize ri_BatchSize for all the
> resultRelInfo elements, not just the first one. Per the attached patch, which
> resolves the issue both on x86_64 and armv7l for me.
I think Your patch is perfect in the sense that it's ready for the future multi-target DML support. +1
Just for learning, could anyone tell me what this loop for? I thought current Postgres's DML supports a single target table, so it's enough to handle the first element of mtstate->resultRelInfo. In that sense, Amit-san and I agreed that we don't put the if block in the for loop yet.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2021-01-21 01:53:14 | Re: POC: postgres_fdw insert batching |
Previous Message | Zhihong Yu | 2021-01-21 01:49:00 | Re: POC: postgres_fdw insert batching |