RE: When (and whether) should we improve the chapter on parallel query to accommodate parallel data updates?

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
> I think each feature should develop the docs as part of feature
> development but if we want to see some additional work like improving
> overall docs for parallel execution as you are suggesting then it can
> be done separately as well.
>
> I think you have a valid point but maybe it would be better to do the
> improvements you are suggesting once the parallel inserts related work
> is committed.
OK. I think at least the words query, statement, execution, and/or operation should be used appropriately before RC (ideally, before beta). Maybe parallel copy should also be put in the chapter. Anyway, I agree that each developer focuses on their features for the moment (parallel insert select, parallel copy, parallel CTAS, etc), and then make the documentation consistent and well-organized after they've settled. (I just felt a bit uneasy to say "this patch looks good" while leaving the document consistency.)

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa