From: | "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com" <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist |
Date: | 2020-10-22 01:53:07 |
Message-ID: | TYAPR01MB29902BB5A769CE797219DAD0FE1D0@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The patch looks good except for the minor one:
(1)
+ * as the total nblocks for a given fork. The cached value returned by
nblocks -> blocks
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-10-22 01:53:53 | Re: PostgresNode::backup uses spread checkpoint? |
Previous Message | Masahiro Ikeda | 2020-10-22 01:44:53 | Re: Add statistics to pg_stat_wal view for wal related parameter tuning |