RE: Multiple hosts in connection string failed to failover in non-hot standby mode

From: "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Hubert Zhang' <zhubert(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Multiple hosts in connection string failed to failover in non-hot standby mode
Date: 2020-10-27 09:30:36
Message-ID: TYAPR01MB299012CAC510D2644AEC2246FE160@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Please send emails in text format. Your email was in HTML, and I changed this reply to text format.

From: Hubert Zhang <zhubert(at)vmware(dot)com>
> Libpq has supported to specify multiple hosts in connection string and enable auto failover when the previous PostgreSQL instance cannot be accessed.
> But when I tried to enable this feature for a non-hot standby, it cannot do the failover with the following messages.
>
> psql: error: could not connect to server: FATAL: the database system is starting up

Was the primary running and accepting connections when you encountered this error? That is, if you specified host="host1 host2", host1 was the non-hot standby and host2 was a running primary? Or only the non-hot standby was running?

If a primary was running, I'd say it's a bug... Perhaps the following part in libpq gives up connection attempts wen the above FATAL error is returned from the server. Maybe libpq should differentiate errors using SQLSTATE and continue connection attempts on other hosts.

[fe-connect.c]
/* Handle errors. */
if (beresp == 'E')
{
if (PG_PROTOCOL_MAJOR(conn->pversion) >= 3)
...
#endif

goto error_return;
}

/* It is an authentication request. */
conn->auth_req_received = true;

/* Get the type of request. */

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arseny Sher 2020-10-27 09:36:24 Use-after-free in 12- EventTriggerAlterTableEnd
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2020-10-27 09:17:19 Re: Question about make coverage-html