RE: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output

From: <Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)nttdata(dot)com>
To: <david(dot)christensen(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output
Date: 2021-06-14 04:53:58
Message-ID: TYAPR01MB28968EA749E143C7E315C8A7C4319@TYAPR01MB2896.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>From: David Christensen <david(dot)christensen(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
>Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 4:18 AM
>To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output
>
>New versions attached to address the initial CF feedback and rebase on HEAD as of now.
>
>0001-Expand-the-units-that-pg_size_pretty-numeric-knows-a.patch 
>
>- expands the units that pg_size_pretty() can handle up to YB.
>
>0002-Expand-the-supported-units-in-pg_size_bytes-to-cover.patch
>
>- expands the units that pg_size_bytes() can handle, up to YB.
>
I don't see the need to extend the unit to YB.
What use case do you have in mind?

Regards,
Shinya Kato

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-06-14 05:11:14 Re: Failure in subscription test 004_sync.pl
Previous Message Amit Khandekar 2021-06-14 04:20:03 Relaxing the sub-transaction restriction in parallel query