From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Amit Kapila' <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: speed up a logical replica setup |
Date: | 2024-01-12 05:08:57 |
Message-ID: | TY3PR01MB9889CCBD4D9DAF8BD2F18541F56F2@TY3PR01MB9889.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Amit, Euler,
> >
> >
> > 3.
> > Options -o/-O were added to specify options for publications/subscriptions.
> >
> >
> > Flexibility is cool. However, I think the cost benefit of it is not good. You
> > have to parse the options to catch preliminary errors. Things like publish only
> > delete and subscription options that conflicts with the embedded ones are
> > additional sources of failure.
> >
>
> Yeah, I am also not sure we need those. Did we discussed about that
> previously? OTOH, we may consider to enhance this tool later if we
> have user demand for such options.
OK, so let's drop it once and consider later as an enhancement.
As Euler said, it leads additional ERRORs.
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | jian he | 2024-01-12 05:19:34 | Re: Compile warnings in dbcommands.c building with meson |
Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2024-01-12 05:07:32 | Re: pub/sub - specifying optional parameters without values. |