From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Masahiko Sawada' <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |
Date: | 2023-11-28 13:58:01 |
Message-ID: | TY3PR01MB98895D94F3243BC360E8D7C8F5BCA@TY3PR01MB9889.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Sawada-san,
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 7:04 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
> <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yeah, we followed binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension(). Also, we set as
> > un-strict to keep a caller function simpler.
> >
> > Currently get_old_cluster_logical_slot_infos() executes a query and it contains
> > binary_upgrade_logical_slot_has_caught_up(). In pg_upgrade layer, we
> assumed
> > either true or false is returned.
> >
> > But if proisstrict is changed true, we must handle the case when NULL is
> returned.
> > It is small but backseat operation.
>
> Which cases are you concerned pg_upgrade could pass NULL to
> binary_upgrade_logical_slot_has_caught_up()?
Actually, we do not expect that it won't input NULL. IIUC all of slots have
slot_name, and subquery uses its name. But will it be kept forever? I think we
can avoid any risk.
> I've not tested it yet but even if it returns NULL, perhaps
> get_old_cluster_logical_slot_infos() would still set curr->caught_up
> to false, no?
Hmm. I checked the C99 specification [1] of strcmp, but it does not define the
case when the NULL is input. So it depends implementation.
[1]: https://www.dii.uchile.cl/~daespino/files/Iso_C_1999_definition.pdf
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2023-11-28 14:24:31 | Re: Partial aggregates pushdown |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2023-11-28 13:26:52 | Re: Missing docs on AT TIME ZONE precedence? |