From: | "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS Delivery)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target |
Date: | 2020-03-18 04:28:34 |
Message-ID: | TU4PR8401MB115254BB9F5C19D3B8D8F7F7EEF70@TU4PR8401MB1152.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
I found a missing column description in the pg_statistic_ext catalog document for this new feature.
The attached patch adds a description of the 'stxstattarget' column to pg_statistic_ext catalog's document.
If there is a better explanation, please correct it.
Regards,
Noriyoshi Shinoda
-----Original Message-----
From: Tomas Vondra [mailto:tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 7:28 AM
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>; Jamison, Kirk <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>; Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>; PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 02:38:56PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>On 2019-Aug-01, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
>> I'll move it to the next CF. Aside from the issues pointed by
>> Kyotaro-san in his review, I still haven't made my mind about whether
>> to base the use statistics targets set for the attributes. That's
>> what we're doing now, but I'm not sure it's a good idea after adding separate statistics target.
>> I wonder what Dean's opinion on this is, as he added the current logic.
>
>Latest patch no longer applies. Please update. And since you already
>seem to have handled all review comments since it was Ready for
>Committer, and you now know Dean's opinion on the remaining question,
>please get it pushed.
>
OK, I've pushed this the patch, after some minor polishing.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pg_statistic_ext_doc_v1.diff | application/octet-stream | 966 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-03-18 04:33:05 | Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-03-18 04:20:47 | Re: Online checksums verification in the backend |