From: | FFW_Rude <FFW_Rude(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Same query doing slow then quick |
Date: | 2012-09-26 14:19:44 |
Message-ID: | SNT111-W51DC270B21BF269BE8DC49E19C0@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
My bad. Did not see that part.
I tried to elevate buffer and SHMAX was a problem. I'll give it another try and will keep you posted.
Thank you.
Rude - Last Territory
Ou écouter ?http://www.deezer.com/fr/music/last-territory/the-last-hope-3617781 (Post-apocalyptic Metal)http://www.deezer.com/fr/music/rude-undertaker (Pop-Rock)
Ou acheter ?La Fnachttp://recherche.fnac.com/fmia14622213/Last-Territory
http://recherche.fnac.com/fmia14770622/Rude-Undertaker
iTuneshttp://itunes.apple.com/us/artist/last-territory/id533857009?ign-mpt=uo%3D4
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 07:17:56 -0700
From: ml-node+s1045698n5725506h46(at)n5(dot)nabble(dot)com
To: FFW_Rude(at)hotmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Same query doing slow then quick
On 09/26/2012 16:14, FFW_Rude wrote:
> Thank for you answer.
>
> shared_buffer is at 24Mb
> effective_cache_size at 2048Mb
>
> What do you mean properly ? That's not really helping a novice...
>
from my previous mail:
before looking further, please configure shared_buffers and
effective_cache_size properly, it's fundamental
you'll probably need to raise SHMALL/SHMMAX, take a look at:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/kernel-resources.html
for 4GB of RAM I would start with shared_buffers to 512MB and
effective_cache_size to 2GB
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Same-query-doing-slow-then-quick-tp5725486p5725505.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
No trees were killed in the creation of this message.
However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list ([hidden email])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
jcigar.vcf (304 bytes) Download Attachment
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Same-query-doing-slow-then-quick-tp5725486p5725506.html
To unsubscribe from Same query doing slow then quick, click here.
NAML
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Same-query-doing-slow-then-quick-tp5725486p5725508.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | FFW_Rude | 2012-09-26 14:41:34 | Re: Same query doing slow then quick |
Previous Message | Julien Cigar | 2012-09-26 14:17:19 | Re: Same query doing slow then quick |