| From: | suganthi Sekar <suganthi(at)uniphore(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: constraint exclusion with ineq condition (Re: server hardware tuning.) |
| Date: | 2019-02-14 10:49:16 |
| Message-ID: | SG2PR01MB29677E0B9863A71DBD86DF0FBC670@SG2PR01MB2967.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi,
Thanks, i know if explicitly we give in where condition it is working.
i thought with below parameter in Postgresq11 this issue is fixed ?
enable_partitionwise_join to 'on';
what is the use of enable_partitionwise_join to 'on';
Thanks for your response.
Regards
Suganthi Sekar
________________________________
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Sent: 14 February 2019 16:10:01
To: suganthi Sekar
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: constraint exclusion with ineq condition (Re: server hardware tuning.)
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:38:36AM +0000, suganthi Sekar wrote:
> u mean the below parameter need to set on . its already on only.
> alter system set constraint_exclusion to 'on';
No, I said:
> You can work around it by specifying the same condition on b.call_created_date:
> > AND b.call_created_date >='2017-11-01' AND b.call_created_date<'2017-11-30'
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2019-02-14 12:37:49 | Re: partition pruning |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2019-02-14 10:40:01 | Re: constraint exclusion with ineq condition (Re: server hardware tuning.) |