From: | ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: should I worry? |
Date: | 2007-11-02 18:20:52 |
Message-ID: | Pine.UW2.4.53.0711021916360.21053@sun.pyrenet |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:11:14 +0000
> From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
> To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I worry?
>
> ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr wrote:
> > I'm now testing 8.3beta2 on a relatively big (10G) database.
> > I've tried with pg_dymp -Fc/pg_restore and pg_dump/pgsql and get those
> > errors:
>
> Could you be a bit more specific? The database you tried to restore to
> was empty, right? Can you post the dump file (schema-only)?
Yes it was empty, Sorry, I can't post the schema, it belongs to one of my
customer...
All triggers in the schema are named. So I assume they are triggers for
foreign keys.
It's hard to tell if all foreign keys have been created after restore is
complete...
>
> > I'm also playing with checkpoint logging. What should I see? few buffers
> > dump, little write time, little sync time?
>
> Depends on how much activity there is. If there's a lot of dirty
> buffers, a lot of written buffers and long write time is perfectly normal.
>
>
Thanks for the explanation.
Regards
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin M. Roy | 2007-11-02 18:43:39 | Re: Machine available for community use |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-02 18:19:24 | Re: Proposal: Select ... AS OF Savepoint |