Re: Porting reports (cont'd)

From: Olivier PRENANT <ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Porting reports (cont'd)
Date: 2000-05-05 20:47:33
Message-ID: Pine.UW2.4.21.0005052243360.21183-100000@server.pyrenet.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 5 May 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > About Unixware 7, I sent a few reports for witch I did'nt get answer.
>
> I did see some traffic about this; not sure if it was with you or with
> Billie Allie (sp?).
>
> > There are 2 problems:
> > backend/utils/adt/int8.c doesn't compile out of the box.
> > changing around line 416 (for loop) the test i > 0 by 0 < i as previously
> > reported help things.
> > Although I haven't tried, I'm quite sur changing anything else would help
> > the same way...
Ok!! May be this one won't hurt any sensibility!

Change the test from i > 0 to i

It means the same thing, i can't go negative because of the test below, it
works on all systems (including brain dead SCO compiler) and doesn't
change the source so much.

I'll try to publish a patch this week -end.
>
> Compiler bugs are a PITA. But Postgres can't have inline code to
> handle all cases, esp. cases like this. "if (var op const)" is imho
> the usual style for comparisons, and obfuscating that for a single
> buggy platform isn't a Good Thing.
>
> > The second is more tricky: On UW 71x, accept call has a bug (witch doesn't
> > exist in 7.01). in case of a unix domain sa_family is set to 0 instead of
> > 1 (AF_UNIX)...
> > What I did was to add the following lines after accept in pqcomm.c:
> > if (port->raddr.sa.sa_family == 0)
> > port->raddr.sa.sa_family = AF_UNIX;
>
> OK, more bugs in the same category as above (esp. since they don't
> exist on other versions of UW even). Check the current SCO FAQ, and if
> these aren't mentioned then please add some words. Also, if you want
> to post a full patch for either or both problems, then other UW users
> can have a workaround until SCO gets around to fixing their problems.
>
> Sorry for not being able to do more, but platform bugs are really a
> case-by-case thing, and these two both seem to put the burden on the
> platform to get it right imho.
>
> Regards.
>
> - Thomas
You've been very helpfull; many thanks
>
>
Regards,
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
Quartier d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-05 22:23:38 Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-05 16:53:28 RFP: PostgreSQL Replication ...