From: | Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen(at)simple(dot)dallas(dot)tx(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #1865: isinf wrongly dectected under Solaris 9 |
Date: | 2005-09-11 22:02:43 |
Message-ID: | Pine.SOC.4.60.0509111656170.13765@blade.simplesystems.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen(at)simple(dot)dallas(dot)tx(dot)us> writes:
>> Ugh. I do think that readline 5.0 itself has a minor bug in that ldd
>> on libreadline.so does not show a dependency on the curses library,
>> even though it is obviously required. This means that the linkage of
>> libreadline.so is incomplete.
>
> That's fairly standard I fear. Certainly libreadline is like that on
> my Fedora machine (and it doesn't stop our configure script from getting
> it right).
>
> It may be that the presence of both libedit and libreadline is what's
> messing things up. I seem to recall fixing configure to deal with that
> [ digs in logs ... ] oh, here we go:
That certainly seems like a reasonable conclusion. I would be
perfectly happy to use libedit rather than libreadline, but I wrongly
assumed that without it command line editing would not function.
Thanks for identifying the cause of the problem.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen(at)simple(dot)dallas(dot)tx(dot)us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-09-12 10:48:25 | Re: BUG #1864: Strange behavoir of batches |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-11 07:03:57 | Re: BUG #1871: operations with data types |