Re: [GENERAL] Limitation

From: Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
To: John Huttley <john(at)mwk(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Limitation
Date: 1999-06-25 00:37:47
Message-ID: Pine.SGI.3.95.990624173604.1581B-100000@bleu.west.spy.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, John Huttley wrote:

Heh, that sounds kinda pleasant...it's so good you mistook it for
a commercial RDBMS. :)

# most of the heavy work is done by about 4 people. Actually there are
# things in libpq -large object support- I will investigate. Thats very
# much nibbling around the edge.

I've often thought about donig some work on the BLOB support, the
backend storage parts, but for my main project that would use them, I've
got pretty far into splitting and encoding the data. That's actually how
we do it in our Sybase databases because BLOBs are just too hard to deal
with with regards to replication, etc...

--
SA, beyond.com My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
| Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hub.Org News Admin 1999-06-25 03:36:52
Previous Message John Huttley 1999-06-25 00:26:28 Fsync and Linux