Re: SCSI vs SATA

From: Charles Sprickman <spork(at)bway(dot)net>
To: david(at)lang(dot)hm
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date: 2007-04-06 22:40:33
Message-ID: Pine.OSX.4.64.0704061838560.23748@white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, david(at)lang(dot)hm wrote:

> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> Based on experience I think that on average server drives are more
>> reliable than consumer grade drives, and can take more punishment.
>
> this I am not sure about

I think they should survey Tivo owners next time.

Perfect stress-testing environment. Mine runs at over 50C most of the
time, and it's writing 2 video streams 24/7. What more could you do to
punish a drive? :)

Charles

>
> David Lang
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message david 2007-04-06 23:00:06 Re: SCSI vs SATA
Previous Message david 2007-04-06 22:04:08 Re: SCSI vs SATA