From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1 |
Date: | 2005-01-21 18:44:43 |
Message-ID: | Pine.OSF.4.61.0501212033520.352045@kosh.hut.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> If the patch is ready to be committed early in the cycle, I'd say most
>> definitely ... just depends on how late in the cycle its ready ...
>
> My recollection is that it's quite far from being complete. I had hoped
> to spend some time during the 8.1 cycle helping Heikki finish it up,
> but if we stick to the 2-month-dev-cycle idea I'm afraid there's no way
> it'll be done in time. I thought that "some time" would probably amount
> to a solid man-month or so, and there's no way I can spend half my time
> on just one feature for this cycle.
>
> If Heikki wants this in for 8.1, the right thing to do is vote against
> the short-dev-cycle idea. But we need a plausible answer about what to
> do about ARC to make that credible...
I'm not sure what I want.
If the 8.1 cycle really is a short one, say 3 months, then I have no
problem waiting for 8.2. But we have a very bad track record regarding
short-dev-cycles. I honestly don't believe we can get 8.1 released before
July.
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dawid Kuroczko | 2005-01-21 18:54:56 | Re: US Patents vs Non-US software ... |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-01-21 17:59:01 | Re: ARC patent |