Re: [HACKERS] PostGreSQL v6.2.1 for Linux Alpha (repost)

From: "Pedro J(dot) Lobo" <pjlobo(at)euitt(dot)upm(dot)es>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: PostgreSQL hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostGreSQL v6.2.1 for Linux Alpha (repost)
Date: 1998-02-13 13:30:41
Message-ID: Pine.OSF.3.96.980213142514.13667A-100000@haddock.euitt.upm.es
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 13 Feb 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

>> Yes, I'm running PostgreSQL since the 6.0 days, now 6.2.1p6, on a DEC
>> Alpha with Digital Unix 3.2c, and it has always worked like a charm. I use
>> the DEC C compiler, if it makes any difference. The type sizes are exactly
>> those above.
>
>There is a possibility that the v6.3beta has trouble with your type of
>machine. Since you have had success in the past, and (presumeably) would like
>to use v6.3, would you have time to try testing the new package to see if it
>installs for your machine?

Of course I will... when I can find the time :-( In fact, I want to make
some tests with hash indices, to see if they work properly or not. I hope
to have the time to grab the last snapshot, build it and run the
regression tests on Monday. I'll let you know as soon I have any result
(positive or not).

>We have enough reports of possible trouble (and a new port support scheme)
>that each platform needs to be tested before v6.3 is released.

Sure. BTW, should we move this discussion to pgsql-ports?

Pedro.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedro José Lobo Perea Tel: +34 1 336 78 19
Centro de Cálculo Fax: +34 1 331 92 29
EUIT Telecomunicación - UPM e-mail: pjlobo(at)euitt(dot)upm(dot)es

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message sferac 1998-02-13 13:36:10 Re: [QUESTIONS] Error on PostgreSQL agregate SUM() function??
Previous Message Michael Meskes 1998-02-13 13:30:05 actual ecpg version