Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?

From: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date: 2002-09-16 03:56:02
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.4.44.0209161255170.654-100000@angelic.cynic.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> The problem with the non-symlink solution is that it is error-prone/ugly
> on all the platforms, not just NT4.X.

Actually, it's really just the environment variable solution that's
error prone, I think. Putting it in the config file is fine. It's
just a matter of someone coding it.

cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2002-09-16 03:59:26 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-16 03:48:48 Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues