Re: [JDBC] problem with new autocommit config parameter

From: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [JDBC] problem with new autocommit config parameter
Date: 2002-09-10 02:59:55
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.4.44.0209101158440.13186-100000@angelic.cynic.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> If autocommit=off really seriously breaks JDBC then I don't think a
> simple SET command at the start of a session is going to do that much
> to improve robustness. What if the user issues another SET to turn it
> on?

You mean, to turn it off again? The driver should catch this, in theory.

In practice we could probably live with saying, "Don't use SET
AUTOCOMMIT; use the methods on the Connection class instead."

Probably the driver should be changed for 7.3 just to use the server's
SET AUTOCOMMIT functionality....

cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Chittenden 2002-09-10 03:02:19 Re: Optimization levels when compiling PostgreSQL...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-10 02:59:18 Re: Optimization levels when compiling PostgreSQL...

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-10 03:27:13 Re: [JDBC] problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2002-09-10 02:51:21 Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc