| From: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Gulutzan <71022(dot)733(at)compuserve(dot)com>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Inheritance |
| Date: | 2002-09-06 05:40:57 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.44.0209061440060.818-100000@angelic.cynic.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5 Sep 2002, Greg Copeland wrote:
> Sounds like a mechanism to make the distinction between virtual (child
> can override parent) and non-virtual (child is constrained by the
> parent) constraints are needed.
Oh, I should mention that I have no problem with being able to declare a
constraint "overridable" by subtables, so long as it's not the default,
and it's clear from the table definition that it might be overridden.
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Achmad Amin | 2002-09-06 05:54:41 | Libpq.dll Souce Code |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-09-06 05:37:59 | Re: Inheritance |