From: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | A Testimonial |
Date: | 2002-09-04 04:03:54 |
Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.44.0209041301570.453-100000@angelic.cynic.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
A friend of mine, Jacques Deguest <jack(at)deguest(dot)net>, recently asked me
for advice on a database server, and of course I recommended PostgreSQL.
(He'd been using MySQL up to this point.) Here's what he sent me a week
later:
I'd like to get back to what you previously wrote and say that
after having used a little bit Postgres and thoroughly read the
documentation, you under-stated the truth. MySQL is no match
to Postgres. I am blasted by the features, the power and the
profesionalism, not to mention all I was dreaming of: constraints,
checks, views, procedures, user functions, and full support of
Unicode + transcode from and to Unicode, among other things.
Having experienced both, I can tell you now that you don't realize
what you leave until you actually leave it.
My only regret is that I did not do the move much much earlier. My
fault.
He says we should feel free to put this up on the web site, if we like.
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-04 04:05:10 | Re: Call closed: Almost happy ending (from "Data files became huge with no apparent reason" thread) |
Previous Message | Darren Ferguson | 2002-09-04 03:54:26 | Re: parameterized views? |