| From: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas O'Dowd <tom(at)nooper(dot)com> |
| Cc: | João Paulo Caldas Ribeiro <jp(at)mobicomp(dot)com>, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Connections/Statements/ResultSets (Was: Re: Pooling |
| Date: | 2002-09-02 05:00:11 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.44.0209021359060.477-100000@angelic.cynic.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On 31 Aug 2002, Thomas O'Dowd wrote:
> In either case, it would be nice to have a nice big red flag waved on
> the list if the multiple ResultSet thing is going to go away. It will
> definitely break a lot of my code and I'm not so sure its so wrong.
It's not wrong, but it's not at all portable to assume that you
can have more than one active ResultSet on a connection. So you
may want to change your habit anyway, unless you're sure you'll
never have to use another database.
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Th Templ | 2002-09-02 11:53:43 | Length of sql cols in postgresql |
| Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2002-09-02 03:15:50 | Re: JDBC patch, so that bigint indexes get used |