From: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Ruprecht <chrup(at)earthlink(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ProstGreSQL on RAID Question |
Date: | 2002-08-17 06:32:33 |
Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.44.0208171530150.472-100000@angelic.cynic.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Chris Ruprecht wrote:
> Thanks Curt - yes, I have the log files on a different drive all
> together. I was thinking more along the lines of OS block size (4 KB)
> vs. Postgres block size (8 KB by default) vs. RAID block size (32 KB).
> Is there anything I should change?
The RAID stripe size is not a big deal; generally you want to keep
it smallish to maximize the number of outstanding requests you can
service at the same time, but I find more often that it's the raid
controller limiting me on this point.
OS block size might as well be the same as postgresql block size;
making it smaller just increases the chances that a block you need
will only be "half" in the cache, and thus require a disk read
anyway.
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel L Banta | 2002-08-18 17:24:15 | Re: Fw: OID |
Previous Message | dinakar | 2002-08-17 06:08:21 | Need your invaluable help....! |