| From: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Inheritance |
| Date: | 2002-08-14 04:43:43 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.44.0208141339370.6919-100000@angelic.cynic.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Surely 99% of the implementation problems could be solved with an
> index type that can span tables?
Maybe.
But my problem is not so much that it's broken, as nobody can
explain exactly what "fixed" would be. I mean, completely fixed,
not just one obvious problem fixed.
Just my opinion of course, but I think it would be best to have a
detailed description of how everything in inheritance is supposed to
work, write a set of tests from that, and then fix the implementation to
conform to the tests.
And I think a detailed description comes most easily when you have
a logical model to work from.
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-14 04:44:39 | Re: Inheritance |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-14 04:42:48 | Re: [HACKERS] tsearch vs. fulltextindex |