Re: WAL file location

From: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL file location
Date: 2002-08-03 11:42:46
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.4.44.0208032040190.517-100000@angelic.cynic.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> [Symlinks] don't scale,

Given that we have only one directory for the log file, this would not
appear to be a problem.

> they are not portable,

That's certainly a problem if we intend to run on systems without them.

> and it is difficult for
> applications (like the Postgres backend) to know that they are dealing
> with a simlink or a real file.

Er...that's the whole point of symlinks.

Not that I really care either way about the whole issue, so long
as we do *something*.

cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2002-08-03 12:55:36 Re: getpid() function
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2002-08-03 11:32:10 Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?