Re: PostgreSQL in mission-critical system

From: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
To: Rune Teigen <rune(dot)teigen(at)ikke-tull(dot)vision-consulting(dot)no>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in mission-critical system
Date: 2002-07-13 10:17:16
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.4.44.0207131916170.454-100000@angelic.cynic.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Rune Teigen wrote:

> Any views on the suitability of PostgreSQL for this task? Should we rather
> go for a commercial solution? Any experience?

You should probably go with whatever database you (or your DBA)
know best. If you don't know any, PostgreSQL is as good as any.
Just make sure you test a lot and go through some simulated disaster
scenarios to see just what you need to do to recover.

cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curt Sampson 2002-07-13 10:20:54 Re: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2002-07-13 10:11:33 Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL