| From: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | builder <sarah(dot)fraser(at)cnet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2002-07-12 07:52:11 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.44.0207121650160.436-100000@angelic.cynic.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 10 Jul 2002, builder wrote:
> Which is better, PostgreSQL or MySQL? Both are excellent products with
> unique strengths, and the choice is often a matter of personal
> preference. Read on for a useful comparison of these two open source
> database systems.
> http://builder.com.com/article.jhtml?id=u00320020624gcn01.htm
For some definition of "useful." You say in your table that postgres
is slower. How did you measure this?
Not many Web developers use PostgreSQL because they feel that
the additional features degrade performance.
Why developers should feel that features such as MVCC will degrade
performance, I have no idea.
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder | 2002-07-12 07:55:06 | Re: Hardware for PG |
| Previous Message | Sam Liddicott | 2002-07-12 07:43:25 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |