Re: WAL -> Replication

From: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Mike Biamonte <mbiamonte(at)affinitysolutions(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL -> Replication
Date: 2002-04-26 05:38:05
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.4.43.0204261437130.1733-100000@angelic.cynic.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> WAL files are kept only until an fsync(), checkpoint, then reused.

One could keep them longer though, if one really wanted to.

> Also, the info is tied to direct locations in the file. You could do
> this for hot backup, but it would require quite bit of coding to make it
> work.

That's kind of too bad, since log shipping is a very popular method of
backup and replication.

Not that I'm volunteering to fix this. :-)

cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francois Suter 2002-04-26 06:52:33 Re: pid gets overwritten in OSX
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2002-04-26 05:36:37 Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction