From: | Andy Ruhl <acruhl(at)sdf(dot)lonestar(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
Cc: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: postgresql under Windows is slow |
Date: | 2002-01-31 17:05:12 |
Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.33.0201311702220.26475-100000@sdf.lonestar.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> even worse, we have to port our application to Windows and it should
> run under W95..XP on different hardware (PII ...). It'll run in
> single-user environment (thank goodness). Database will have about
> 20-30 K rows.
Ugh. Why pay for an OS these days? The free ones are getting too good.
It's amazing how entrenched Windows is.
> > My own experience is that postgresql runs quite a bit slower on WinMe than
> > my NetBSD box (same hardware), but I don't consider that to be a problem.
> >
>
> Did you make some special tuning ? btw, what's about locale support ?
It was a very quick, seat of the pants test. I made a junk schema with
some insert statements. I noticed that it took a few seconds longer to
finish on Windows than in NetBSD. Didn't do anything more than that. Don't
know about locale stuff, I never have to change that stuff...
Andy
acruhl(at)sdf(dot)lonestar(dot)org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-01-31 18:34:16 | Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-31 16:47:49 | Re: [SQL] Regression tests failed on 7.2rc2 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-01-31 18:34:16 | Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow |
Previous Message | Bill Studenmund | 2002-01-31 16:33:50 | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |