| From: | Andy Ruhl <acruhl(at)sdf(dot)lonestar(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgresql under Windows is slow |
| Date: | 2002-01-31 16:13:38 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.33.0201311611110.6578-100000@sdf.lonestar.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> anybody has an experience how is stable postgresql under Windows system ?
> I tried postgresq 7.1 under Cygwin, Windows 98 and was dissapointed
> by very bad performance. Are there something I could tune ?
> I got 250 sel/sec on simple select from table with 500 rows !
> Under Linux I have 2500 sel/sec.
What are your plans for postgresql on Windows? Just by the nature of the
OS, I'd never expect too much performance from a Cygwin app, especially
one like postgresql. Do you plan on running it on 98 in a production
manner?
My own experience is that postgresql runs quite a bit slower on WinMe than
my NetBSD box (same hardware), but I don't consider that to be a problem.
Andy
acruhl(at)sdf(dot)lonestar(dot)org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2002-01-31 16:33:28 | Re: postgresql under Windows is slow |
| Previous Message | Radu-Adrian Popescu | 2002-01-31 15:51:53 | Re: Regression tests failed on 7.2rc2 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bill Studenmund | 2002-01-31 16:26:40 | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-31 15:45:38 | Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings |