| From: | Bill Studenmund <wrstuden(at)netbsd(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |
| Date: | 2002-01-29 17:43:22 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.33.0201290939350.24201-100000@vespasia.home-net.internetconnect.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Bill Studenmund wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> >
> > > Is *the path* below the same as "search path* in other
> > > postings about this thread ?
> >
> > I think so. I believe the path I've been talking about is the one in step
> > 6 below.
>
> What I can find in SQL99 is SQL-path.
> Does *the path*(i.e search path) mean SQL-path ?
> They don't seem the same to me.
While we may have not been using the terminology of the spec, I think we
have been talking about schema paths from SQL99.
One difference between our discussions and SQL99 I've noticed is that
we've spoken of having the path find functions (and operators and
aggregates), types, _and_tables_. SQL99 doesn't have tables in there
AFAICT, but I think it makes sense.
Take care,
Bill
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-01-29 18:33:00 | Re: 7.2 RPMs (Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released) |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2002-01-29 17:12:58 | Re: PostgreSQL 7.1.3 on OpenServer 5 |