Re: [HACKERS] Disk block size issues.

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Darren King <darrenk(at)insightdist(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Disk block size issues.
Date: 1998-01-09 21:48:59
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.3.96.980109173733.311V-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 9 Jan 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Other stuff...
> >
> > Could the block size be made into a command line option, like "-k 8192"?
>
> Too scary for me.

I kinda like this one...if it can be relatively implimented. The main
reason I like it is that, like -B and -S, it means that someone could deal
with "tweaking" a system without having to recompile from scratch...

That said, I'd much rather that -k option being something that is
an option only available when *creating* the database (ie. initdb) with a
pg_blocksize file being created and checked when postmaster starts up.

Essentially, make '-k 8192' an option only available to the postgres
process, not the postmaster process. And not settable by the -O option to
postmaster...

> Yes, we could do that, but if they ever start the postmaster with a
> different value, he is lost.

See above...it should only be something that is settable at initdb time,
not accessible via 'postmaster' itself...

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-01-09 21:56:00 Re: [HACKERS] grant broken
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-01-09 21:33:05 Views on UNIONs