From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Darren King <darrenk(at)insightdist(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Disk block size issues. |
Date: | 1998-01-09 21:48:59 |
Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.3.96.980109173733.311V-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 9 Jan 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Other stuff...
> >
> > Could the block size be made into a command line option, like "-k 8192"?
>
> Too scary for me.
I kinda like this one...if it can be relatively implimented. The main
reason I like it is that, like -B and -S, it means that someone could deal
with "tweaking" a system without having to recompile from scratch...
That said, I'd much rather that -k option being something that is
an option only available when *creating* the database (ie. initdb) with a
pg_blocksize file being created and checked when postmaster starts up.
Essentially, make '-k 8192' an option only available to the postgres
process, not the postmaster process. And not settable by the -O option to
postmaster...
> Yes, we could do that, but if they ever start the postmaster with a
> different value, he is lost.
See above...it should only be something that is settable at initdb time,
not accessible via 'postmaster' itself...
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-01-09 21:56:00 | Re: [HACKERS] grant broken |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-01-09 21:33:05 | Views on UNIONs |