On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Checked the pg_class table, and radnew still existed, but radhist didn't,
> > so did the following to "fix" it...
> >
> > update pg_class set relname = 'radhist' where relname = 'radnew';
> >
> > Any particular reason why that was a bad idea? I appears to have
> > worked...
>
> I believe this is what alter table does.
That's what I think too...I was just worried that it might do
something else on top of it all:(