Re: [HACKERS] pg_dumpall

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: martin(at)biochemistry(dot)ucl(dot)ac(dot)uk, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dumpall
Date: 1998-03-06 17:34:42
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.3.95.980306123258.26524P-100000@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> >
> >
> > I've dumped a 6.1 database using the pg_dumpall from 6.3 to load into
> > 6.3.
> >
> > The format of the data to be copied into pg_user is wrong - there are
> > not enough columns. I guess this may be a problem from having skipped
> > out 6.2, but it would be nice if it worked properly :-)
> >
> > Also one of the column names I had used in my old database is no longer
> > allowed ('local'). Again, it would be nice if pg_dumpall could spot
> > no-longer allowed column names and warn the user rather than having
> > psql crash when one tries to import the data and then having to trace
> > back to where the problem was...
>
> Yikes, we never changed pg_user to pg_shadow in pg_dumpall. Isn't that
> the real problem. Need to have that patched, or people will not be able
> to upgrade. Applying patch now.
>
> Do I put this patch in the patches directory?

Yes...Neil, can you put a "patches page" up on the WWW site,
linked to the main page, that lists the patches as well as a short
description of what each one does?

Bruce, can you get me a patch for this? I'm going to review the
patches that I do have now, and the ones that look perfectly safe (ie. I
have no doubt about), will get included on the CD rom also...not as part
of the source, just as a seperate file to be used...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message gold bag 1998-03-06 20:11:05 SQL Test suite V6.0 is here --
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-03-06 17:23:33 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dumpall