| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom I Helbekkmo <tih(at)Hamartun(dot)Priv(dot)NO> |
| Cc: | Goran Thyni <goran(at)bildbasen(dot)se>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] configure on linux |
| Date: | 1998-02-04 13:14:16 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.3.95.980204081226.24451F-100000@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 4 Feb 1998, Tom I Helbekkmo wrote:
> Actually, it would be good to get all tas() assembly implementations
> out of include/storage/s_lock.h and into genuine .s files like this.
> With the current way of doing it, the assembly routine has to be
> "static", because s_lock.h is included several places, which is a bit
> silly, but a worse consequence is that GCC will inline the assembly
> code at optimization levels above 2, thus breaking it.. Is this what
> you're doing, and the reason why the above problem occurred?
Actually, the problem seems to be configure not quite doing things
as I expect :(
> Is it too late to get the VAX stuff into 6.3? It's really not much,
> and it would be kinda fun... :-)
Ssend in the patch, we'll look it over. If it doesn't go into
v6.3, then we'll have the patch online for v6.4 :)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Meskes, Michael | 1998-02-04 13:31:15 | RE: [HACKERS] Hi |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-02-04 13:05:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Hi |