Re: [HACKERS] postgres performance

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Shiby Thomas <sthomas(at)cise(dot)ufl(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres performance
Date: 1998-01-15 18:15:59
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.3.95.980115131434.16579O-100000@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Shiby Thomas wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have installed PostgreSQL6.2.1 from my own user account (I was just trying
> to test out something first). It seems to be running too slow. For example,
> the self join of a table with roughly 300K records takes 2-3 hours. There is
> an index on the join attribute.
> I am running it on a 8 processor (each is a 248 MHz SUNW,UltraSPARC-II)
> machine with a total of 2.0 GB main memory.
> But, since it is not parallelized, it may get the power of only one processor.
>
> Does it make a difference in performance since I have installed it from my
> user account, and not the root. Also, I compiled it using gcc on a
> solaris 2.5 machine and the machine I ran it is a solaris 2.6 machine. I did
> that since the solaris 2.6 machine is the fastest we have here and the
> executable
> compiled on 2.5 was running properly also. Can that have an impact on the
> performance?

There may be optimizations in the 2.6 libraries that would improve
performance, but I wouldn't suspect that it would make *that* big of a
difference. What is your SQL/join statemnt? How are you running
postmaster? What does 'explain' show?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-01-15 18:23:07 Re: [HACKERS] postgres performance
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 1998-01-15 18:02:25 Patch for glibc2 date problems