From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Shiby Thomas <sthomas(at)cise(dot)ufl(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] postgres performance |
Date: | 1998-01-15 18:15:59 |
Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.3.95.980115131434.16579O-100000@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Shiby Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed PostgreSQL6.2.1 from my own user account (I was just trying
> to test out something first). It seems to be running too slow. For example,
> the self join of a table with roughly 300K records takes 2-3 hours. There is
> an index on the join attribute.
> I am running it on a 8 processor (each is a 248 MHz SUNW,UltraSPARC-II)
> machine with a total of 2.0 GB main memory.
> But, since it is not parallelized, it may get the power of only one processor.
>
> Does it make a difference in performance since I have installed it from my
> user account, and not the root. Also, I compiled it using gcc on a
> solaris 2.5 machine and the machine I ran it is a solaris 2.6 machine. I did
> that since the solaris 2.6 machine is the fastest we have here and the
> executable
> compiled on 2.5 was running properly also. Can that have an impact on the
> performance?
There may be optimizations in the 2.6 libraries that would improve
performance, but I wouldn't suspect that it would make *that* big of a
difference. What is your SQL/join statemnt? How are you running
postmaster? What does 'explain' show?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-01-15 18:23:07 | Re: [HACKERS] postgres performance |
Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 1998-01-15 18:02:25 | Patch for glibc2 date problems |